> “Some important points are that it would not be pollution-free. Coal is still very dirty,” said Baker, conceding that perhaps the pollution would no longer be airborne, but “water and soil would still be at risk.”
Not emission free as I am reading it.
Still, if economically viable at reducing amount of CO2 released not effectively terrible as it extends the life of existing infrastructure to ease transition to replacement.
> “Some important points are that it would not be pollution-free. Coal is still very dirty,” said Baker, conceding that perhaps the pollution would no longer be airborne, but “water and soil would still be at risk.”
Not emission free as I am reading it.
Still, if economically viable at reducing amount of CO2 released not effectively terrible as it extends the life of existing infrastructure to ease transition to replacement.